Non-perturbative corrections to the one-loop free energy induced by a massive scalar field on a stationary slowly varying in space gravitational background
I.S. Kalinichenko, P.O. Kazinski

TL;DR
This paper derives explicit non-perturbative corrections to the one-loop gravitational effective action caused by a massive scalar field in stationary, slowly varying gravitational backgrounds, highlighting differences between perturbative and non-perturbative parts.
Contribution
It provides explicit formulas for non-perturbative corrections at zero and finite temperatures, and distinguishes their dependence on the Killing vector and covariant structures.
Findings
Perturbative part matches known large mass expansion.
Non-perturbative part depends explicitly on the Killing vector.
Non-perturbative corrections cannot be expressed covariantly in terms of metric alone.
Abstract
The explicit expressions for the one-loop non-perturbative corrections to the gravitational effective action induced by a scalar field on a stationary gravitational background are obtained both at zero and finite temperatures. The perturbative and non-perturbative contributions to the one-loop effective action are explicitly separated. It is proved that, after a suitable renormalization, the perturbative part of the effective action at zero temperature can be expressed in a covariant form solely in terms of the metric and its derivatives. This part coincides with the known large mass expansion of the one-loop effective action. The non-perturbative part of the renormalized one-loop effective action at zero temperature is proved to depend explicitly on the Killing vector defining the vacuum state of quantum fields. This part cannot be expressed in a covariant way through the metric and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
