Calculating the mass spectrum of primordial black holes
Sam Young, Christian T. Byrnes, Misao Sasaki

TL;DR
This paper revises the calculation of primordial black hole abundance, highlighting the overestimation caused by standard methods and proposing the use of density contrast over curvature perturbation for more accurate results.
Contribution
It introduces a correction to PBH formation calculations by advocating for the density contrast over the curvature perturbation, and compares different theoretical approaches.
Findings
Standard calculations overestimate PBH abundance by orders of magnitude.
Using density contrast $\Delta$ aligns results between Press-Schechter and peaks theory.
Varying spectral index affects PBH abundance significantly.
Abstract
We reinspect the calculation for the mass fraction of primordial black holes (PBHs) which are formed from primordial perturbations, finding that performing the calculation using the comoving curvature perturbation in the standard way vastly overestimates the number of PBHs, by many orders of magnitude. This is because PBHs form shortly after horizon entry, meaning modes significantly larger than the PBH are unobservable and should not affect whether a PBH forms or not - this important effect is not taken into account by smoothing the distribution in the standard fashion. We discuss alternative methods and argue that the density contrast, , should be used instead as super-horizon modes are damped by a factor . We make a comparison between using a Press-Schechter approach and peaks theory, finding that the two are in close agreement in the region of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
