A Consistent Study of Metallicity Evolution at 0.8 < z < 2.6
Eva Wuyts, Jaron Kurk, Natascha M. F\"orster Schreiber, Reinhard, Genzel, Emily Wisnioski, Kaushala Bandara, Stijn Wuyts, Alessandra Beifiori,, Ralf Bender, Gabriel B. Brammer, Andreas Burkert, Peter Buschkamp, C., Marcella Carollo, Jeffrey Chan, Ric Davies, Frank Eisenhauer

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of the mass-metallicity relation in galaxies from redshift 0.8 to 2.6, revealing a consistent slope at low masses and challenging some existing models linking metallicity, mass, and star formation rate.
Contribution
It provides a uniform analysis of metallicity evolution over a wide redshift range using consistent data and methods, highlighting the evolution of the turnover mass in the relation.
Findings
Constant slope at the low-mass end of the MZR.
Evolution of the characteristic turnover mass with redshift.
No correlation between [NII]/Ha ratio and SFR at fixed mass and redshift.
Abstract
We present the correlations between stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR) and [NII]/Ha flux ratio as indicator of gas-phase metallicity for a sample of 222 galaxies at 0.8 < z < 2.6 and log(M*/Msun)=9.0-11.5 from the LUCI, SINS/zC-SINF and KMOS3D surveys. This sample provides a unique analysis of the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) over an extended redshift range using consistent data analysis techniques and strong-line metallicity indicator. We find a constant slope at the low-mass end of the relation and can fully describe its redshift evolution through the evolution of the characteristic turnover mass where the relation begins to flatten at the asymptotic metallicity. At fixed mass and redshift, our data do not show a correlation between the [NII]/Ha ratio and SFR, which disagrees with the 0.2-0.3dex offset in [NII]/Ha predicted by the "fundamental relation" between stellar mass,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
