Herbrand's Fundamental Theorem: The Historical Facts and their Streamlining
Claus-Peter Wirth

TL;DR
This paper revisits Herbrand's Fundamental Theorem, clarifying its historical development, analyzing its core structure, and demonstrating the proof correction using Heijenoort's generalized rules, with a focus on its significance in predicate logic.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of Herbrand's theorem, incorporating Heijenoort's correction, and offers a didactic example to clarify the proof's inner structure and historical context.
Findings
Heijenoort's generalized rules improve the proof of Herbrand's Theorem.
The correction addresses Herbrand's 'False Lemma' effectively.
Herbrand's theorem is central to predicate logic, with a concise and elegant formulation.
Abstract
Using Heijenoort's unpublished generalized rules of quantification, we discuss the proof of Herbrand's Fundamental Theorem in the form of Heijenoort's correction of Herbrand's "False Lemma" and present a didactic example. Although we are mainly concerned with the inner structure of Herbrand's Fundamental Theorem and the questions of its quality and its depth, we also discuss the outer questions of its historical context and why Bernays called it "the central theorem of predicate logic" and considered the form of its expression to be "concise and felicitous".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Theory of Mathematics · Logic, programming, and type systems · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
