Star Formation Rates from [CII] 158 um and Mid Infrared Emission Lines for Starbursts and AGN
Lusine Sargsyan, Anahit Samsonyan, Vianney Lebouteiller, Daniel, Weedman, Donald Barry, Jeronimo Bernard-Salas, James Houck, and Henrik Spoon

TL;DR
This study calibrates the [CII] 158 um emission line as a reliable indicator of star formation rates across diverse galaxy types, including starbursts and AGN, with about 50% precision.
Contribution
It provides a new calibration linking [CII] luminosity to star formation rate, applicable even in AGN-dominated sources, based on a large Herschel PACS galaxy sample.
Findings
[CII] luminosity correlates with SFR with ~50% accuracy.
[CII] emission can be used to estimate SFR regardless of AGN presence.
The [CII] line to continuum ratio does not significantly differ between starbursts and AGN.
Abstract
A summary is presented for 130 galaxies observed with the Herschel PACS instrument to measure fluxes for the [CII] 158 um emission line. Sources cover a wide range of active galactic nucleus to starburst classifications, as derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) strength measured with the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph. Redshifts from [CII] and line to continuum strengths (equivalent width of [CII]) are given for the full sample, which includes 18 new [CII] flux measures. Calibration of L([CII)]) as a star formation rate (SFR) indicator is determined by comparing [CII] luminosities with mid-infrared [NeII] and [NeIII] emission line luminosities; this gives the same result as determining SFR using bolometric luminosities of reradiating dust from starbursts: log SFR = log L([CII)]) - 7.0, for SFR in solar masses per year and L([CII]) in solar luminosities. We conclude that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
