Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Years of IceCube Data
M. G. Aartsen, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M., Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, C. Arguelles, T. C. Arlen, J. Auffenberg, X., Bai, S. W. Barwick, V. Baum, J. J. Beatty, J. Becker Tjus, K.-H. Becker, S., BenZvi, P. Berghaus, D. Berley, E. Bernardini

TL;DR
This paper reports the detection of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos in three years of IceCube data, providing strong evidence for extraterrestrial origin and characterizing their flux, energy, and isotropic distribution.
Contribution
First three-year analysis confirming extraterrestrial high-energy neutrino flux with detailed energy and directional data, including the highest-energy neutrino observed to date.
Findings
37 neutrino candidates detected over 988 days
Consistent flux level of approximately 10^{-8} GeV cm^{-2} s^{-1} sr^{-1} per flavor
Rejects atmospheric origin at 5.7 sigma significance
Abstract
A search for high-energy neutrinos interacting within the IceCube detector between 2010 and 2012 provided the first evidence for a high-energy neutrino flux of extraterrestrial origin. Results from an analysis using the same methods with a third year (2012-2013) of data from the complete IceCube detector are consistent with the previously reported astrophysical flux in the 100 TeV - PeV range at the level of per flavor and reject a purely atmospheric explanation for the combined 3-year data at . The data are consistent with expectations for equal fluxes of all three neutrino flavors and with isotropic arrival directions, suggesting either numerous or spatially extended sources. The three-year dataset, with a livetime of 988 days, contains a total of 37 neutrino candidate events with deposited…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
