Instrumentational complexity of music genres and why simplicity sells
Gamaliel Percino, Peter Klimek, Stefan Thurner

TL;DR
This paper quantifies the complexity of music genres based on instrumentation, revealing a stable inverse relationship between variety and uniformity, and shows that more commercially successful styles tend to be simpler and more formulaic.
Contribution
It introduces a novel complexity measure for music styles based on instrumentation and analyzes their evolution over time and relation to commercial success.
Findings
Inverse relation between variety and uniformity in music styles
Styles like disco and new wave show rapid complexity changes in the 70s
More commercially successful styles tend to be less complex and more formulaic
Abstract
Listening habits are strongly influenced by two opposing aspects, the desire for variety and the demand for uniformity in music. In this work we quantify these two notions in terms of musical instrumentation and production technologies that are typically involved in crafting popular music. We assign a "complexity value" to each music style. A style is complex if it shows the property of having both high variety and low uniformity in instrumentation. We find a strong inverse relation between variety and uniformity of music styles that is remarkably stable over the last half century. Individual styles, however, show dramatic changes in their "complexity" during that period. Styles like "new wave" or "disco" quickly climbed towards higher complexity in the 70s and fell back to low complexity levels shortly afterwards, whereas styles like "folk rock" remained at constant high complexity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
