Social imitation vs strategic choice, or consensus vs cooperation in the networked Prisoner's Dilemma
Daniele Vilone, Jose J. Ramasco, Angel S\'anchez, Maxi San Miguel

TL;DR
This study investigates how social imitation and strategic decision-making influence cooperation and consensus in a networked Prisoner's Dilemma, revealing that social imitation promotes uniformity and cooperation, with implications for understanding human social behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a model combining social and strategic updates in the Prisoner's Dilemma, showing how social imitation affects consensus and cooperation across different network structures.
Findings
Voter dynamics enhances consensus and cooperation.
Social imitation acts as interface noise, similar to random noise.
Mixed dynamics may explain moody conditional cooperation.
Abstract
The interplay of social and strategic motivations in human interactions is a largely unexplored question in collective social phenomena. Whether individuals' decisions are taken in a pure strategic basis or due to social pressure without a rational background crucially influences the model outcome. Here we study a networked Prisoner's Dilemma in which decisions are made either based on the replication of the most successful neighbor's strategy (unconditional imitation) or by pure social imitation following an update rule inspired by the voter model. The main effects of the voter dynamics are an enhancement of the final consensus, i.e., asymptotic states are generally uniform, and a promotion of cooperation in certain regions of the parameter space as compared to the outcome of purely strategic updates. Thus, voter dynamics acts as an interface noise and has a similar effect to a pure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
