Discrete Convexity and Polynomial Solvability in Minimum 0-Extension Problems
Hiroshi Hirai

TL;DR
This paper characterizes exactly which graphs allow polynomial-time solutions for the minimum 0-extension problem, by developing a theory of discrete convex functions on orientable modular graphs.
Contribution
It proves that 0-Ext[G] is polynomial-time solvable if and only if G is orientable and modular, completing the classification of tractable cases.
Findings
Polynomial-time solvability for orientable modular graphs.
Development of a discrete convex functions theory on these graphs.
Application of valued CSP results to the problem.
Abstract
For a graph G and a set V containing the vertex set of G, a 0-extension of G is a metric d on V such that d extends the shortest path metric of G and for all x in V there exists a vertex s in G with d(x, s) = 0. The minimum 0-extension problem 0-Ext[G] on G is: given a set V containing V(G) and a nonnegative cost function c defined on the set of all pairs of V, find a 0-extension d of G with \sum c(xy)d(x, y) minimum. The 0-extension problem generalizes a number of basic combinatorial optimization problems, such as minimum (s,t)-cut problem and multiway cut problem. Karzanov proved the polynomial solvability of 0-Ext[G] for a certain large class of modular graphs G, and raised the question: What are the graphs G for which 0-Ext[G] can be solved in polynomial time? He also proved that 0-Ext[G] is NP-hard if G is not modular or not orientable (in a certain sense). In this paper, we prove…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
