Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis

TL;DR

This paper investigates the limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis, revealing how behavioral feedback influences sensor performance, optimal operational regimes, and the role of motor adaptation and phenotypic diversity in navigation efficiency.

Contribution

It introduces analytical models and simulations to identify optimal feedback regimes in bacterial chemotaxis, highlighting the effects of behavioral feedback and motor adaptation on navigation performance.

Findings

Optimal pathway regime maximizes drift velocity across environments

Feedback can induce bifurcations leading to non-chemotactic states

Phenotypic diversity benefits navigation robustness

Abstract

Inputs to signaling pathways can have complex statistics that depend on the environment and on the behavioral response to previous stimuli. Such behavioral feedback is particularly important in navigation. Successful navigation relies on proper coupling between sensors, which gather information during motion, and actuators, which control behavior. Because reorientation conditions future inputs, behavioral feedback can place sensors and actuators in an operational regime different from the resting state. How then can organisms maintain proper information transfer through the pathway while navigating diverse environments? In bacterial chemotaxis, robust performance is often attributed to the zero integral feedback control of the sensor, which guarantees that activity returns to resting state when the input remains constant. While this property provides sensitivity over a wide range of signal intensities, it remains unclear how other parameters affect chemotactic performance, especially when considering that the swimming behavior of the cell determines the input signal. Using analytical models and simulations that incorporate recent experimental evidences about behavioral feedback and flagellar motor adaptation we identify an operational regime of the pathway that maximizes drift velocity for various environments and sensor adaptation rates. This optimal regime is outside the dynamic range of the motor response, but maximizes the contrast between run duration up and down gradients. In steep gradients, the feedback from chemotactic drift can push the system through a bifurcation. This creates a non-chemotactic state that traps cells unless the motor is allowed to adapt. Although motor adaptation helps, we find that as the strength of the feedback increases individual phenotypes cannot maintain the optimal operational regime in all environments, suggesting that diversity could be beneficial.