Comparison of piecewise-constant methods for dark energy
Savvas Nesseris, Domenico Sapone

TL;DR
This paper compares four piecewise-constant methods for analyzing supernova data to understand dark energy and cosmic expansion, introducing new analytic tools and identifying the most effective approach among them.
Contribution
It introduces a novel piecewise-constant method for H(z) and provides new analytic expressions for the other three methods, enhancing dark energy analysis techniques.
Findings
w(z) method is most effective among the studied approaches
The piecewise-constant method for H(z) is newly proposed in this work
Principal component analysis helps decorrelate parameters in w(z) and q(z) methods
Abstract
We compare four different methods that can be used to analyze the type Ia supernovae (SnIa) data, ie to use piecewise-constant functions in terms of: the dark energy equation of state , the deceleration parameter , the Hubble parameter and finally the luminosity distance . These four quantities cover all aspects of the accelerating Universe, ie the phenomenological properties of dark energy, the expansion rate (first and second derivatives) of the Universe and the observations themselves. For the first two cases we also perform principal component analysis (PCA) so as to decorrelate the parameters, while for the last two cases we use novel analytic expressions to find the best-fit parameters. In order to test the methods we create mock SnIa data (2000 points, uniform in redshift ) for three fiducial cosmologies: the cosmological constant model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
