AND-compression of NP-complete problems: Streamlined proof and minor observations
Holger Dell

TL;DR
This paper provides a streamlined, generalized proof of Drucker's theorem on the non-existence of AND-compression for SAT, extending previous results to randomized algorithms and simplifying the original proof techniques.
Contribution
It offers a simplified, more general proof of Drucker's theorem, extending it to randomized algorithms and avoiding complex information-theoretic arguments.
Findings
No polynomial-time AND-compression for SAT unless coNP in NP/poly
Extension of Drucker's result to randomized algorithms with bounded failure probability
Simplified proof using hypergraph tournaments and information theory
Abstract
Drucker (2012) proved the following result: Unless the unlikely complexity-theoretic collapse coNP is in NP/poly occurs, there is no AND-compression for SAT. The result has implications for the compressibility and kernelizability of a whole range of NP-complete parameterized problems. We present a streamlined proof of Drucker's theorem. An AND-compression is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that maps a set of SAT-instances to a single SAT-instance of size poly(max ) such that is satisfiable if and only if all are satisfiable. The "AND" in the name stems from the fact that the predicate " is satisfiable" can be written as the AND of all predicates " is satisfiable". Drucker's result complements the result by Bodlaender et al. (2009) and Fortnow and Santhanam (2010), who proved the analogous statement for OR-compressions, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
