Can a variable gravitational constant resolve the Faint Young Sun Paradox ?
Varun Sahni, Yuri Shtanov

TL;DR
This paper proposes that a slight increase in the gravitational constant in Earth's past could explain the Faint Young Sun Paradox by maintaining sufficient solar luminosity for liquid oceans, aligning with observational bounds.
Contribution
It introduces the idea that small historical variations in G can resolve the paradox and links this to tensions in dark energy measurements from supernovae and cosmological data.
Findings
A percent-level increase in G would have kept Earth's oceans liquid 4 Gyr ago.
Such variations in G are consistent with current observational constraints.
An increased G would result in fainter supernovae, explaining recent tensions in dark energy measurements.
Abstract
Solar models suggest that four billion years ago the young Sun was about 25% fainter than it is today, rendering Earth's oceans frozen and lifeless. However, there is ample geophysical evidence that Earth had a liquid ocean teeming with life 4 Gyr ago. Since , the Sun's luminosity is exceedingly sensitive to small changes in the gravitational constant . We show that a percent-level increase in in the past would have prevented Earth's oceans from freezing, resolving the faint young Sun paradox. Such small changes in are consistent with observational bounds on . Since , an increase in leads to fainter supernovae, creating tension between standard candle and standard ruler probes of dark energy. Precisely such a tension has recently been reported by the Planck team.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
