TL;DR
This paper introduces a fast, bias-free method using Random Chemistry to estimate cascading failure risk in power systems, enabling efficient risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for system reliability improvements.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel, computationally efficient approach combining Random Chemistry with outage probabilities to estimate cascading failure risk and its sensitivities.
Findings
The new method is at least 100 times faster than Monte Carlo sampling.
It accurately estimates risk without measurable bias.
Reducing three line-outage probabilities by 50% decreases risk by 33%.
Abstract
The potential for cascading failure in power systems adds substantially to overall reliability risk. Monte Carlo sampling can be used with a power system model to estimate this impact, but doing so is computationally expensive. This paper presents a new approach to estimating the risk of large cascading blackouts triggered by multiple contingencies. The method uses a search algorithm (Random Chemistry) to identify blackout-causing contingencies, and then combines the results with outage probabilities to estimate overall risk. Comparing this approach with Monte Carlo sampling for two test cases (the IEEE RTS-96 and a 2383 bus model of the Polish system) illustrates that the new approach is at least two orders of magnitude faster than Monte Carlo, without introducing measurable bias. Moreover, the approach enables one to compute the sensitivity of overall blackout risk to individual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
