Gauss and the Eccentric Halsted
Jonathan Sondow

TL;DR
This paper examines historical disputes involving mathematician Gauss, focusing on accusations by Halsted and subsequent refutations by Gauss's descendants and historians, shedding light on the historiography of mathematics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the historical controversy surrounding Gauss and Halsted, clarifying misconceptions and presenting multiple perspectives.
Findings
Halsted's accusations against Gauss are critically examined.
Refutations by Robert Gauss and Florian Cajori are analyzed.
The paper clarifies the historical context of the dispute.
Abstract
We discuss the mathematician George Bruce Halsted's accusations against Carl Friedrich Gauss, as well as refutations both by the latter's American grandson Robert Gauss in a letter to Felix Klein, and by the historian of mathematics Florian Cajori.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical and Literary Studies · History and Theory of Mathematics · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
