Personalized recommendation with corrected similarity
Xuzhen Zhu, Hui Tian, Shimin Cai

TL;DR
This paper introduces a corrected similarity measure for personalized recommendation systems that improves accuracy by addressing bias in similarity estimation, validated through extensive experiments on benchmark datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a novel mutual correction method for similarity estimation, enhancing recommendation accuracy over existing indices.
Findings
CSI outperforms mainstream baselines in experiments
Mutual correction reduces similarity estimation bias
Detailed analysis explains the improvement mechanism
Abstract
Personalized recommendation attracts a surge of interdisciplinary researches. Especially, similarity based methods in applications of real recommendation systems achieve great success. However, the computations of similarities are overestimated or underestimated outstandingly due to the defective strategy of unidirectional similarity estimation. In this paper, we solve this drawback by leveraging mutual correction of forward and backward similarity estimations, and propose a new personalized recommendation index, i.e., corrected similarity based inference (CSI). Through extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets, the results show a greater improvement of CSI in comparison with these mainstream baselines. And the detailed analysis is presented to unveil and understand the origin of such difference between CSI and mainstream indices.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
