Revisiting the universality of (multiple) star formation in present-day star formation regions
Michael Marks, Nathan Leigh, Mirek Giersz, Susanne Pfalzner, Jan, Pflamm-Altenburg, Seungkyung Oh

TL;DR
This paper reevaluates the universality of star formation processes by analyzing binary star populations in various regions, emphasizing the importance of historical density and age in interpreting multiplicity data.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the standard model with dense past environments can explain observed populations, challenging previous conclusions about non-universality.
Findings
The standard model accounts for all known populations with historical density considerations.
Corona Australis likely has an initial density close to its current density.
Degeneracy between age and density affects interpretation of multiplicity data.
Abstract
Populations of multiple stars inside clustered regions are known to change through dynamical interactions. The efficiency of binary disruption is thought to be determined by stellar density. King and collaborators recently investigated the multiplicity properties in young star forming regions and in the Galactic field. They concluded that stellar density-dependent modification of a universal initial binary population (the standard or null hypothesis model) cannot explain the observations. We re-visit their results, analyzing the data within the framework of different model assumptions, namely non-universality without dynamical modification and universality with dynamics. We illustrate that the standard model does account for all known populations if regions were significantly denser in the past. Some of the effects of using present-day cluster properties as proxies for their past values…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
