Kepler-93b: A Terrestrial World Measured to within 120 km, and a Test Case for a New Spitzer Observing Mode
Sarah Ballard, William J. Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Jean-Michel, Desert, Francois Fressin, Li Zeng, Michael W. Werner, Guy R. Davies, Victor, Silva Aguirre, Sarbani Basu, Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Travis S., Metcalfe, Dennis Stello, Timothy R. Bedding, Tiago L. Campante

TL;DR
This paper precisely measures the radius and density of Kepler-93b using Kepler and Spitzer data, demonstrating a new observing mode that reduces uncertainty and confirms its rocky composition.
Contribution
It introduces a new Spitzer observing mode that improves transit radius measurements and provides the most precise radius measurement for Kepler-93b to date.
Findings
Planet radius measured to within 120 km
Planet density consistent with rocky composition
New observing mode reduces measurement uncertainty
Abstract
We present the characterization of the Kepler-93 exoplanetary system, based on three years of photometry gathered by the Kepler spacecraft. The duration and cadence of the Kepler observations, in tandem with the brightness of the star, enable unusually precise constraints on both the planet and its host. We conduct an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry and conclude that the star has an average density of 1.652+/-0.006 g/cm^3. Its mass of 0.911+/-0.033 M_Sun renders it one of the lowest-mass subjects of asteroseismic study. An analysis of the transit signature produced by the planet Kepler-93b, which appears with a period of 4.72673978+/-9.7x10^-7 days, returns a consistent but less precise measurement of the stellar density, 1.72+0.02-0.28 g/cm^3. The agreement of these two values lends credence to the planetary interpretation of the transit signal. The achromatic transit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
