Complexity of checking whether two automata are synchronized by the same language
Marina Maslennikova

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of determining whether two automata share the same set of reset words, establishing that this problem is PSPACE-complete, which indicates high computational difficulty.
Contribution
It proves that checking the equivalence of reset word languages for two automata is PSPACE-complete, highlighting the problem's computational hardness.
Findings
The problem is PSPACE-complete.
Reset word language equivalence is computationally hard.
Implications for automata synchronization analysis.
Abstract
A deterministic finite automaton is said to be synchronizing if it has a reset word, i.e. a word that brings all states of the automaton to a particular one. We prove that it is a PSPACE-complete problem to check whether the language of reset words for a given automaton coincides with the language of reset words for some particular automaton.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · DNA and Biological Computing · Logic, programming, and type systems
