
TL;DR
This paper discusses the generation of non-Gaussianity parameter nl at large angular scales in the CMB, revisiting theoretical bounds and their compatibility with observational data.
Contribution
It revisits the lower bound on nl generated by super-horizon perturbations in curvaton models and highlights the need for re-analysis of current data.
Findings
Lower bound on nl may be compatible with data
Re-analysis of observational data is necessary
Implications for understanding large-scale CMB anomalies
Abstract
The CMB anisotropy at seems to have some special features which include (i) a dipole modulation and (ii) a decrease in power. It is known that both of these effects can be generated if a curvaton-type field has a super-horizon perturbation. It is also known that this will generate non-gaussianity in the same range of , whose magnitude has a lower bound coming from the magnitude of the observed CMB quadrupole. I revisit that bound in the present paper, and point out that it may or may not be compatible with current data which should therefore be re-analysed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
