The Number Density of Quiescent Compact Galaxies at Intermediate Redshift
Ivana Damjanov (1), Ho Seong Hwang (2), Margaret J. Geller (2), Igor, Chilingarian (2,3) ((1) Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, (2), Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, (3) Sternberg Astronomical Institute)

TL;DR
This study investigates the number density evolution of massive, compact, quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshifts (0.2<z<0.6), finding their abundance aligns with high-redshift data and supporting minor merger assembly models.
Contribution
The paper presents a large sample of intermediate-redshift compact galaxies, confirming their similarity to high-redshift counterparts and providing lower limits on their number densities.
Findings
Compact galaxy densities at 0.2<z<0.6 match high-redshift densities.
Less than half the size of local massive systems.
Supports minor merger models of galaxy assembly.
Abstract
Massive compact systems at 0.2<z<0.6 are the missing link between the predominantly compact population of massive quiescent galaxies at high redshift and their analogs and relics in the local volume. The evolution in number density of these extreme objects over cosmic time is the crucial constraining factor for the models of massive galaxy assembly. We select a large sample of ~200 intermediate-redshift massive compacts from the BOSS spectroscopic dataset by identifying point-like SDSS photometric sources with spectroscopic signatures of evolved redshifted galaxies. A subset of our targets have publicly available high-resolution ground-based images that we use to augment the dynamical and stellar population properties of these systems by their structural parameters. We confirm that all BOSS compact candidates are as compact as their high-redshift massive counterparts and less than half…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
