A Map of Dust Reddening to 4.5 kpc from Pan-STARRS1
E. F. Schlafly, G. Green, D. P. Finkbeiner, M. Juric, H.-W. Rix, N. F., Martin, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, P. W. Draper, K. W. Hodapp, N. Kaiser,, R.-P. Kudritzki, E. A. Magnier, N. Metcalfe, J. S. Morgan, P. A. Price, C. W., Stubbs, J. L. Tonry, R. J. Wainscoat, C. Waters

TL;DR
This paper presents a high-resolution map of dust reddening up to 4.5 kpc across most of the northern sky using Pan-STARRS1 stellar photometry, improving understanding of Galactic dust distribution especially in the plane.
Contribution
It introduces a novel reddening-based dust map derived from Pan-STARRS1 data, covering the Galactic plane where previous methods faced challenges.
Findings
Map agrees with SFD and Planck maps at high latitudes
Reddening uncertainty as low as 25 mmag E(B-V)
Provides detailed dust distribution up to 4.5 kpc
Abstract
We present a map of the dust reddening to 4.5 kpc derived from Pan-STARRS1 stellar photometry. The map covers almost the entire sky north of declination -30 degrees at a resolution of 7' to 14', and is based on the estimated distances and reddenings to more than 500 million stars. The technique is designed to map dust in the Galactic plane, where many other techniques are stymied by the presence of multiple dust clouds at different distances along each line of sight. This reddening-based dust map agrees closely with the Schlegel, Finkbeiner, and Davis (SFD; 1998) far-infrared emission-based dust map away from the Galactic plane, and the most prominent differences between the two maps stem from known limitations of SFD in the plane. We also compare the map with Planck, finding likewise good agreement in general at high latitudes. The use of optical data from Pan-STARRS1 yields reddening…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
