Comment on "Froissart bound on total cross section without unknown constants" by A. Martin and S.M. Roy [arXiv:1306.5210]

TL;DR

This paper defends the author's previous work on the Froissart bound against criticisms, clarifying misunderstandings and emphasizing the validity of the original results without unknown constants.

Contribution

It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques of the author's earlier derivation of the Froissart bound, reaffirming the original conclusions.

Findings

Criticisms are inadequate and based on misunderstandings

The original Froissart bound derivation remains valid

No unknown constants are necessary in the derivation

Abstract

Here I explain why critics of my work [arXiv:1104.5314] in the above paper [arXiv:1306.5210] is inadequate.