Determining the stellar masses of submillimetre galaxies: the critical importance of star formation histories
Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski, Christopher C. Hayward, James S. Dunlop,, Victoria A. Bruce, Michele Cirasuolo, Fergus Cullen, Lars Hernquist

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different star formation histories affect the accuracy of stellar mass estimates in submillimetre galaxies, emphasizing the importance of using complex SFHs for reliable results.
Contribution
It demonstrates that assuming two-component SFHs yields the most accurate stellar mass estimates for simulated submm galaxies, highlighting the importance of SFH choice.
Findings
Two-component SFHs provide the most accurate stellar masses.
Single-burst SFHs significantly underestimate galaxy masses.
Inherent scatter of about a factor of 2 exists in SED-derived masses.
Abstract
Submillimetre (submm) galaxies are among the most rapidly star-forming and most massive high-redshift galaxies; thus, their properties provide important constraints on galaxy evolution models. However, there is still a debate about their stellar masses and their nature in the context of the general galaxy population. To test the reliability of their stellar mass determinations, we used a sample of simulated submm galaxies for which we derived stellar masses via spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling (with Grasil, Magphys, Hyperz and LePhare) adopting various star formation histories (SFHs). We found that the assumption of SFHs with two independent components leads to the most accurate stellar masses. Exponentially declining SFHs (tau) lead to lower masses (albeit still consistent with the true values), while the assumption of single-burst SFHs results in a significant mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
