Compatible Quantum Theory

TL;DR

This paper introduces Compatible Quantum Theory (CQT), a realistic formulation of quantum mechanics that combines microscopic and macroscopic parts, emphasizing contextual truths and the role of macroscopic mechanisms in selecting physical frameworks.

Contribution

It presents a new realistic formulation of quantum mechanics, CQT, integrating microscopic and macroscopic components and addressing the indeterminacy of contextual truths.

Findings

CQT is based on Hilbert space ontology and Gleason's theorem.

Microscopic theory has multiple contextual truths, leading to indeterminacy.

Macroscopic mechanisms are necessary to select physical frameworks.

Abstract

Formulations of quantum mechanics can be characterized as realistic, operationalist, or a combination of the two. In this paper a realistic theory is defined as describing a closed system entirely by means of entities and concepts pertaining to the system. An operationalist theory, on the other hand, requires in addition entities external to the system. A realistic formulation comprises an ontology, the set of (mathematical) entities that describe the system, and assertions, the set of correct statements (predictions) the theory makes about the objects in the ontology. Classical mechanics is the prime example of a realistic physical theory. The present realistic formulation of the histories approach originally introduced by Griffiths, which we call 'Compatible Quantum Theory (CQT)', consists of a 'microscopic' part (MIQM), which applies to a closed quantum system of any size, and a 'macroscopic' part (MAQM), which requires the participation of a large (ideally, an infinite) system. The first (MIQM) can be fully formulated based solely on the assumption of a Hilbert space ontology and the noncontextuality of probability values, relying in an essential way on Gleason's theorem and on an application to dynamics due in large part to Nistico. The microscopic theory does not, however, possess a unique corpus of assertions, but rather a multiplicity of contextual truths ('c-truths'), each one associated with a different framework. This circumstance leads us to consider the microscopic theory to be physically indeterminate and therefore incomplete, though logically coherent. The completion of the theory requires a macroscopic mechanism for selecting a physical framework, which is part of the macroscopic theory (MAQM). Detailed definitions and proofs are presented in the appendices