The Bulge-Disk Decomposed Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 1<z<3 in CANDELS
V.A. Bruce, J.S. Dunlop, R.J. McLure, M. Cirasuolo, F. Buitrago,, R.A.A. Bowler, T.A. Targett, E.F. Bell, D.H. McIntosh, A. Dekel, S.M. Faber,, H.C. Ferguson, N.A. Grogin, W. Hartley, D.D. Kocevski, A.M. Koekemoer, D.C., Koo, E.J. McGrath

TL;DR
This study uses bulge-disk decomposition of massive galaxies at 1<z<3 from CANDELS to analyze their morphological and spectral evolution, revealing the transition from disk to bulge dominance and the existence of passive disks.
Contribution
It introduces a refined bulge-disk decomposition method that separates galaxy components and derives their individual properties across redshifts, providing new insights into galaxy evolution.
Findings
Galaxies transition from disk-dominated to bulge-dominated from z=3 to z=1.
A notable fraction of passive galaxies are disk-dominated, challenging simple morphological-quenching models.
Existence of passive disks, often flatter than star-forming disks, with re-emergence of large disks at high star-formation rates.
Abstract
We present the results of a new and improved study of the morphological and spectral evolution of massive galaxies over the redshift range 1<z<3. Our analysis is based on a bulge-disk decomposition of 396 galaxies with Mstar>10^11 Msolar from the CANDELS WFC3/IR imaging within the COSMOS and UKIDSS UDS survey fields. We find that, by modelling the H(160) image of each galaxy with a combination of a de Vaucouleurs bulge (Sersic index n=4) and an exponential disk (n=1), we can then lock all derived morphological parameters for the bulge and disk components, and successfully reproduce the shorter-wavelength J(125), i(814), v(606) HST images simply by floating the magnitudes of the two components. This then yields sub-divided 4-band HST photometry for the bulge and disk components which, with no additional priors, is well described by spectrophotometric models of galaxy evolution. Armed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
