Testing the Pauli Exclusion Principle for electrons at LNGS
H. Shi, S. Bartalucci, S. Bertolucci, C. Berucci, A.M. Bragadireanu,, M. Cargnelli, A. Clozza, C. Curceanu, L. De Paolis, S. Di Matteo, A., d'Uffizi, J.-P. Egger, C. Guaraldo, M. Iliescu, T. Ishiwatari, J. Marton, M., Laubenstein, E. Milotti, D. Pietreanu, K. Piscicchia

TL;DR
This paper reports on high-precision experiments testing the Pauli exclusion principle for electrons, setting extremely stringent upper limits on violations, and proposes a follow-up experiment with significantly increased sensitivity based on recent detector performance tests.
Contribution
It presents the most sensitive upper limit to date on PEP violations for electrons and demonstrates the feasibility of a follow-up experiment with two orders of magnitude improved sensitivity.
Findings
Established an upper limit of 10^{-29} for PEP violation probability.
Validated detector performance to support increased sensitivity in future experiments.
Proposed a realistic plan to enhance experimental sensitivity by two orders of magnitude.
Abstract
High-precision experiments have been done to test the Pauli exclusion principle (PEP) for electrons by searching for anomalous -series X-rays from a Cu target supplied with electric current. With the highest sensitivity, the VIP (VIolation of Pauli Exclusion Principle) experiment set an upper limit at the level of for the probability that an external electron captured by a Cu atom can make the transition from the 2 state to a 1 state already occupied by two electrons. In a follow-up experiment at Gran Sasso, we aim to increase the sensitivity by two orders of magnitude. We show proofs that the proposed improvement factor is realistic based on the results from recent performance tests of the detectors we did at Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
