A surprising consistency between the far-infrared galaxy luminosity functions of the field and Coma
S. Hickinbottom, C. J. Simpson, P. A. James, E. Ibar, D. Carter, A., Boselli, C. A. Collins, J. I. Davies, L. Dunne, S. Eales, C. Fuller, B., Mobasher, R. F. Peletier, S. Phillipps, D. J. B. Smith, R. J. Smith, E. A., Valentijn

TL;DR
This study compares the far-infrared galaxy luminosity functions of the Coma Cluster with those of the field and Virgo Cluster, revealing a surprising similarity with the field but not with Virgo.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of Coma's far-infrared luminosity functions with those of the field and Virgo, highlighting unexpected similarities.
Findings
Coma's luminosity functions match the field's shape at all wavelengths.
There is a discrepancy between Coma and Virgo luminosity functions.
Coma shows an excess of bright sources compared to blank fields.
Abstract
We present new deep images of the Coma Cluster from the ESA Herschel Space Observatory at wavelengths of 70, 100 and 160 microns, covering an area of 1.75 x 1.0 square degrees encompassing the core and southwest infall region. Our data display an excess of sources at flux densities above 100 mJy compared to blank-field surveys, as expected. We use extensive optical spectroscopy of this region to identify cluster members and hence produce cluster luminosity functions in all three photometric bands. We compare our results to the local field galaxy luminosity function, and the luminosity functions from the Herschel Virgo Cluster Survey (HeViCS). We find consistency between the shapes of the Coma and field galaxy luminosity functions at all three wavelengths, however we do not find the same level of agreement with that of the Virgo Cluster.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
