Taming the post-Newtonian expansion: Simplifying the modes of the gravitational wave energy flux at infinity for a point particle in a circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole
Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

TL;DR
This paper introduces a factorization method that simplifies the high-order post-Newtonian expansions of gravitational wave energy flux modes for a particle orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole, significantly reducing complexity and improving convergence.
Contribution
The authors present a novel factorization technique that simplifies the spherical harmonic modes of the energy flux, reducing the number of terms and removing half-integer PN terms, especially at high PN orders.
Findings
Reduces the number of terms in high-l modes by up to a factor of 150.
Removes all half-integer PN terms from the modes.
Improves convergence of the series, surpassing exponential resummation in some cases.
Abstract
(Abridged) High-order terms in the post-Newtonian (PN) expansions of various quantities for compact binaries exhibit a combinatorial increase in complexity, including ever-increasing numbers of transcendentals. Here we consider the gravitational wave energy flux at infinity from a point particle in a circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, which is known to 22PN beyond the lowest-order Newtonian prediction, at which point each order has over 1000 terms. We introduce a factorization that considerably simplifies the spherical harmonic modes of the energy flux (and thus also the amplitudes of the spherical harmonic modes of the gravitational waves); it is likely that much of the complexity this factorization removes is due to curved-space wave propagation (e.g., tail effects). For the modes with azimuthal number l of 7 or greater, this factorization reduces the expressions for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
