Bipartite graphs whose squares are not chromatic-choosable
Seog-Jin Kim, Boram Park

TL;DR
This paper constructs bipartite graphs whose squares are not chromatic-choosable, providing counterexamples to the conjecture that all such squares are chromatic-choosable, and shows the discrepancy can be arbitrarily large.
Contribution
It presents the first known bipartite graphs with non-chromatic-choosable squares, disproving a conjecture and demonstrating the potential for large differences between chromatic and list chromatic numbers.
Findings
Constructed bipartite graphs with non-chromatic-choosable squares
Showed the difference between chromatic and list chromatic numbers can be arbitrarily large
Counterexamples to the conjecture that all bipartite graph squares are chromatic-choosable
Abstract
The square of a graph is the graph defined on such that two vertices and are adjacent in if the distance between and in is at most 2. Let and be the chromatic number and the list chromatic number of , respectively. A graph is called {\em chromatic-choosable} if . It is an interesting problem to find graphs that are chromatic-choosable. Motivated by the List Total Coloring Conjecture, Kostochka and Woodall (2001) proposed the List Square Coloring Conjecture which states that is chromatic-choosable for every graph . Recently, Kim and Park showed that the List Square Coloring Conjecture does not hold in general by finding a family of graphs whose squares are complete multipartite graphs with partite sets of unbounded size. It is a well-known fact that the List Total Coloring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
