Quantum model for psychological measurements: from the projection postulate to interference of mental observables represented as positive operator valued measures
Andrei Khrennikov, Irina Basieva

TL;DR
This paper explores a quantum-like framework for psychological measurements, emphasizing the use of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) to model mental observables and their interference effects, advancing understanding of cognitive phenomena.
Contribution
It introduces a POVM-based quantum model for cognitive measurements, extending the traditional projection postulate and providing a psychological interpretation of interference terms.
Findings
POVMs offer a more general framework for modeling mental observables.
Interference terms in POVMs have complex structures with psychological significance.
The model explains phenomena like ambiguous figure recognition and disjunction effects.
Abstract
Recently foundational issues of applicability of the formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) to cognitive psychology, decision making, and psychophysics attracted a lot of interest. In particular, in \cite{DKBB} the possibility to use of the projection postulate and representation of "mental observables" by Hermitian operators was discussed in very detail. The main conclusion of the recent discussions on the foundations of "quantum(-like) cognitive psychology" is that one has to be careful in determination of conditions of applicability of the projection postulate as a mathematical tool for description of measurements of observables represented by Hermitian operators. To represent some statistical experimental data (both physical and mental) in the quantum(-like) way, one has to use generalized quantum observables given by positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). This paper contains a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
