The super-replication theorem under proportional transaction costs revisited
Walter Schachermayer

TL;DR
This paper revisits the super-replication theorem in a market with transaction costs, establishing duality results under different admissibility conditions and clarifying the dual processes involved.
Contribution
It provides two versions of the super-replication theorem linking primal admissibility conditions to dual martingale properties, enhancing theoretical understanding.
Findings
Two versions of the super-replication theorem are established.
Connections between primal admissibility and dual martingale types are clarified.
The results extend the classical theorem to markets with proportional transaction costs.
Abstract
We consider a financial market with one riskless and one risky asset. The super-replication theorem states that there is no duality gap in the problem of super-replicating a contingent claim under transaction costs and the associated dual problem. We give two versions of this theorem. The first theorem relates a num\'eraire-based admissibility condition in the primal problem to the notion of a local martingale in the dual problem. The second theorem relates a num\'eraire -free admissibility condition in the primal problem to the notion of a uniformly integrable martingale in the dual problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Credit Risk and Financial Regulations · Risk and Portfolio Optimization
