Threshold resummation in SCET vs. direct QCD: a systematic comparison
Luca Rottoli

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares soft-gluon resummation techniques in SCET and direct QCD for Higgs production, revealing their analytical and phenomenological differences using saddle point analysis.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analytical and phenomenological comparison of SCET and direct QCD resummation methods for Higgs production.
Findings
Quantitative differences between SCET and direct QCD approaches.
Analytical insights into resummation techniques.
Phenomenological implications for Higgs production.
Abstract
We perform a systematic comparison of soft-gluon resummation in SCET and in a standard "direct" QCD (dQCD) approach, both from an analytical and a phenomenological point of view. In particular, we concentrate on Higgs boson production in gluon-gluon fusion at a hadron collider. Using specifically a saddle point argument, we arrive at a detailed understanding of the quantitative differences between these two approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · High-Energy Particle Collisions Research · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
