Planck intermediate results. XXII. Frequency dependence of thermal emission from Galactic dust in intensity and polarization
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, M. I. R. Alves, G. Aniano, C., Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A., J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P., Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock

TL;DR
This study analyzes the frequency-dependent intensity and polarization of Galactic dust emission using Planck data, revealing differences in spectral indices and polarization fractions that inform foreground separation in cosmology.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of dust emission spectral indices and polarization fractions across frequencies, improving understanding of Galactic foregrounds in microwave observations.
Findings
Mean polarization spectral index: 1.59±0.02
Mean intensity spectral index: 1.51±0.01
Dust polarization fraction decreases by 21% from 353 to 70 GHz
Abstract
Planck has mapped the intensity and polarization of the sky at microwave frequencies with unprecedented sensitivity. We make use of the Planck 353 GHz I, Q, and U Stokes maps as dust templates, and cross-correlate them with the Planck and WMAP data at 12 frequencies from 23 to 353 GHz, over circular patches with 10 degree radius. The cross-correlation analysis is performed for both intensity and polarization data in a consistent manner. We use a mask that focuses our analysis on the diffuse interstellar medium at intermediate Galactic latitudes. We determine the spectral indices of dust emission in intensity and polarization between 100 and 353 GHz, for each sky-patch. The mean values, for polarization and for intensity, for a mean dust temperature of 19.6 K, are close, but significantly different (). We determine the mean spectral energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
