Planck intermediate results. XXI. Comparison of polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust at 353 GHz with interstellar polarization in the visible
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, D. Alina, G. Aniano,, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C., Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, C. Beichman, K., Benabed, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli

TL;DR
This study compares polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust at 353 GHz with interstellar polarization in the visible, providing new insights into dust properties and highlighting discrepancies with existing dust models.
Contribution
It introduces a novel comparison method between submillimetre emission and visible polarization, revealing the need for updated optical property models of aligned dust grains.
Findings
Measured ratios R_{S/V} and R_{P/p} with specific values and uncertainties.
Found R_{S/V} aligns with existing dust models, but R_{P/p} does not, indicating model deficiencies.
Identified the necessity to revise optical properties in dust grain models.
Abstract
The Planck survey provides unprecedented full-sky coverage of the submillimetre polarized emission from Galactic dust, bringing new constraints on the properties of dust. The dust grains that emit the radiation seen by Planck in the submillimetre also extinguish and polarize starlight in the visible. Comparison of the polarization of the emission and of the interstellar polarization on selected lines of sight probed by stars provides unique new diagnostics of the emission and light scattering properties of dust. Using ancillary catalogues of interstellar polarization and extinction of starlight, we obtain the degree of polarization, , and the optical depth in the V band to the star, . Toward these stars we measure the submillimetre polarized intensity, , and total intensity, , in the Planck 353 GHz channel. For those lines of sight through the diffuse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
