Poisson-de Rham homology of hypertoric varieties and nilpotent cones
Nicholas Proudfoot, Travis Schedler

TL;DR
This paper proves a conjecture relating Poisson-de Rham homology and de Rham cohomology for hypertoric varieties and more general symplectic resolutions, providing explicit computations and conjectural formulas involving matroid invariants.
Contribution
It establishes the isomorphism between Poisson-de Rham homology and de Rham cohomology for hypertoric cones and extends the result to a broader class of symplectic resolutions, with explicit polynomial computations.
Findings
Poisson-de Rham homology of hypertoric cones matches de Rham cohomology of their resolutions.
Computed the 2-variable Poisson-de Rham-Poincare polynomial for hypertoric varieties.
Connected the polynomial to Tutte polynomials and Kostka polynomials, with conjectures for nilpotent cones.
Abstract
We prove a conjecture of Etingof and the second author for hypertoric varieties, that the Poisson-de Rham homology of a unimodular hypertoric cone is isomorphic to the de Rham cohomology of its hypertoric resolution. More generally, we prove that this conjecture holds for an arbitrary conical variety admitting a symplectic resolution if and only if it holds in degree zero for all normal slices to symplectic leaves. The Poisson-de Rham homology of a Poisson cone inherits a second grading. In the hypertoric case, we compute the resulting 2-variable Poisson-de Rham-Poincare polynomial, and prove that it is equal to a specialization of an enrichment of the Tutte polynomial of a matroid that was introduced by Denham. We also compute this polynomial for S3-varieties of type A in terms of Kostka polynomials, modulo a previous conjecture of the first author, and we give a conjectural answer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
