Signature of biased range in the non-dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity and its measurements with satellite-satellite tracking missions: Theoretical studies
Li-E Qiang (1), Peng Xu (2) ((1) Chang'an University, Xi'an, China,, (2) Academy of Mathematics, Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,, Beijing, China.)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how satellite tracking missions can detect or constrain non-dynamical Chern-Simons gravity by analyzing characteristic range signals, providing potential bounds on the theory's parameters through observational data.
Contribution
It derives the range observable signature of non-dynamical Chern-Simons gravity in satellite tracking and estimates bounds on the theory's mass scale from satellite mission data.
Findings
Range signal characteristic of Chern-Simons gravity identified
Potential to constrain the mass scale M_CS to >1.9×10^{-9} eV with GRACE data
Stronger bounds expected from future GRACE FO mission
Abstract
Having great accuracy in the range and range rate measurements,he GRACE mission and the planed GRACE Follow On mission can in principle be employed to place strong constraints on certain relativistic gravitational theories. In this paper, we work out the range observable of the non-dynamical Chern-Simons modified gravity for the Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking (SST) measurements. We find out that a characteristic time accumulating range signal appears in non-dynamical Chern-Simons gravity, which has no analogue found in the standard parity-preserving metric theories of gravity. The magnitude of this Chern-Simons range signal will reach a few times of for each free flight of these SST missions, here is the dimensionless post-Newtonian parameter of the non-dynamical Chern-Simons theory. Therefore, with the 12 years data of the GRACE mission, one expects that the mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
