Comparison of observing modes for statistical estimation of the 21cm signal from the Epoch of Reionisation
Cathryn M. Trott

TL;DR
This paper compares different observing modes for 21cm signal detection from the Epoch of Reionisation, analyzing their noise characteristics and effectiveness using a new framework applied to MWA data.
Contribution
It introduces a general framework for estimating power spectrum uncertainties across various observing modes and applies it to MWA data, highlighting the advantages of zenith drift scans.
Findings
Zenith drift scans can slightly reduce uncertainty compared to tracked scans.
The framework accounts for beam shape, antenna distribution, and mode coherence.
Application to MWA data demonstrates practical benefits of alternative observing modes.
Abstract
(Abridged) Noise considerations for experiments that aim to statistically estimate the 21 cm signal from high redshift neutral hydrogen during the Epoch of Reionisation (EoR) using interferometric data are typically computed assuming a tracked observation, where the telescope pointing centre and instrument phase centre are the same over the observation. Current low frequency interferometers use aperture arrays of fixed dipoles, which are steered electronically on the sky, and have different properties to mechanically-steered single apertures, such as reduced sensitivity away from zenith, and discrete pointing positions on the sky. Use of two additional observing modes is encouraged: (1) zenith drift, where the pointing centre remains fixed at the zenith, and the phase centre tracks the sky, and (2) drift+shift, where the telescope uses discrete pointing centres, and the sky drifts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
