Validating Predictions of Unobserved Quantities
Todd A. Oliver, Gabriel Terejanu, Christopher S. Simmons, and Robert, D. Moser

TL;DR
This paper proposes a validation framework for computational models to reliably predict unobserved quantities, especially in extrapolative scenarios, by incorporating uncertainty quantification and testing with a nonlinear oscillator example.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive validation and predictive assessment process that accounts for known sources of error in models, enhancing the reliability of extrapolative predictions.
Findings
Validated the methodology on a nonlinear oscillator example.
Demonstrated improved confidence in unobserved QoI predictions.
Provided a structured approach for model validation beyond observed data.
Abstract
The ultimate purpose of most computational models is to make predictions, commonly in support of some decision-making process (e.g., for design or operation of some system). The quantities that need to be predicted (the quantities of interest or QoIs) are generally not experimentally observable before the prediction, since otherwise no prediction would be needed. Assessing the validity of such extrapolative predictions, which is critical to informed decision-making, is challenging. In classical approaches to validation, model outputs for observed quantities are compared to observations to determine if they are consistent. By itself, this consistency only ensures that the model can predict the observed quantities under the conditions of the observations. This limitation dramatically reduces the utility of the validation effort for decision making because it implies nothing about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
