The Universal Relation of Galactic Chemical Evolution: The Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation
Jabran Zahid, Gabriel Dima, Rolf Kudritzki, Lisa Kewley, Margaret, Geller, Ho Seong Hwang, John Silverman, Daichi Kashino

TL;DR
This paper reveals a universal, redshift-independent relationship between metallicity and stellar-to-gas mass ratio that explains the origin of the mass-metallicity relation in galaxies up to redshift 1.6.
Contribution
It introduces a universal relation between metallicity and stellar-to-gas mass ratio, explaining the mass-metallicity relation's origin and evolution.
Findings
The mass-metallicity relation has a universal slope set by the gas-stellar mass relationship.
The turnover in the relation occurs when oxygen in gas is comparable to that in low-mass stars.
A new equation estimates gas mass from stellar mass and metallicity for galaxies up to redshift 1.6.
Abstract
We examine the mass-metallicity relation for . The mass-metallicity relation follows a steep slope with a turnover or `knee' at stellar masses around . At stellar masses higher than the characteristic turnover mass, the mass-metallicity relation flattens as metallicities begin to saturate. We show that the redshift evolution of the mass-metallicity relation depends only on evolution of the characteristic turnover mass. The relationship between metallicity and the stellar mass normalized to the characteristic turnover mass is independent of redshift. We find that the redshift independent slope of the mass-metallicity relation is set by the slope of the relationship between gas mass and stellar mass. The turnover in the mass-metallicity relation occurs when the gas-phase oxygen abundance is high enough that the amount of oxygen locked up in low mass stars…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
