Binary versus non-binary information in real time series: empirical results and maximum-entropy matrix models
Assaf Almog, Diego Garlaschelli

TL;DR
This paper investigates the binary (sign) and non-binary properties of real time series, especially financial data, using maximum-entropy models and spin physics analogies to reveal underlying collective behaviors and regimes.
Contribution
It introduces an information-theoretic framework linking binary and non-binary time series properties with maximum-entropy ensembles and phase diagrams, advancing understanding of collective effects in complex systems.
Findings
Strong nonlinear relations between binary and non-binary properties of financial time series.
Identification of regimes where market mode reflects endogenous effects, noise, or combined influences.
Accurate modeling of binary/non-binary relations using maximum-entropy ensembles and spin models.
Abstract
The dynamics of complex systems, from financial markets to the brain, can be monitored in terms of multiple time series of activity of the constituent units, such as stocks or neurons respectively. While the main focus of time series analysis is on the magnitude of temporal increments, a significant piece of information is encoded into the binary projection (i.e. the sign) of such increments. In this paper we provide further evidence of this by showing strong nonlinear relations between binary and non-binary properties of financial time series. These relations are a novel quantification of the fact that extreme price increments occur more often when most stocks move in the same direction. We then introduce an information-theoretic approach to the analysis of the binary signature of single and multiple time series. Through the definition of maximum-entropy ensembles of binary matrices…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
