On infrared pseudogap in cuprate and pnictide high-temperature superconductors
S. J. Moon, Y. S. Lee, A. A. Schafgans, A. V. Chubukov, S. Kasahara,, T. Shibauchi, T. Terashima, Y. Matsuda, M. A. Tanatar, R. Prozorov, A., Thaler, P. C. Canfield, S. L. Bud'ko, A. S. Sefat, D. Mandrus, K. Segawa, Y., Ando, and D. N. Basov

TL;DR
This study compares the infrared signatures of the pseudogap in cuprate and pnictide superconductors, revealing similarities and the pseudogap's relation to magnetism, with implications for understanding high-temperature superconductivity.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of pseudogap features in cuprate and pnictide superconductors and links pseudogap formation to magnetic resonance modes.
Findings
Similar spectroscopic features of pseudogap in cuprates and pnictides.
Pseudogap energy scale identified at 700-900 cm-1.
Pseudogap formation correlates with magnetic resonance modes.
Abstract
We investigate infrared manifestations of the pseudogap in the prototypical cuprate and pnictide superconductors: YBa2Cu3Oy and BaFe2As2 (Ba122) systems. We find remarkable similarities between the spectroscopic features attributable to the pseudogap in these two classes of superconductors. The hallmarks of the pseudogap state in both systems include a weak absorption feature at about 500 cm-1 followed by a featureless continuum between 500 and 1500 cm-1 in the conductivity data and a significant suppression in the scattering rate below 700 - 900 cm-1. The latter result allows us to identify the energy scale associated with the pseudogap . We find that in the Ba122-based materials the superconductivity-induced changes of the infrared spectra occur in the frequency region below 100 - 200 cm-1, which is much lower than the energy scale of the pseudogap. We performed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
