Single Spin Asymmetries in Charged Kaon Production from Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering on a Transversely Polarized $^3{\rm{He}}$ Target
Y. X. Zhao, Y. Wang, K. Allada, K. Aniol, J.R.M. Annand, T. Averett,, F. Benmokhtar, W. Bertozzi, P.C. Bradshaw, P. Bosted, A. Camsonne, M. Canan,, G.D. Cates, C. Chen, J.-P. Chen, W. Chen, K. Chirapatpimol, E. Chudakov, E., Cisbani, J.C. Cornejo, F. Cusanno, M.M. Dalton

TL;DR
This study presents the first measurement of single spin asymmetries in charged kaon production from semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering on a transversely polarized helium-3 target, providing insights into nucleon spin structure.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental extraction of Collins and Sivers moments for charged kaons on a transversely polarized helium-3 target, comparing results with theoretical predictions.
Findings
K+ moments are consistent with zero; K- moments favor negative values.
K+ Sivers moments agree with theoretical predictions.
K- Sivers moments differ from predictions at 2-sigma level.
Abstract
We report the first measurement of target single spin asymmetries of charged kaons produced in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering of electrons off a transversely polarized target. Both the Collins and Sivers moments, which are related to the nucleon transversity and Sivers distributions, respectively, are extracted over the kinematic range of 0.10.4 for and production. While the Collins and Sivers moments for are consistent with zero within the experimental uncertainties, both moments for favor negative values. The Sivers moments are compared to the theoretical prediction from a phenomenological fit to the world data. While the Sivers moments are consistent with the prediction, the results differ from the prediction at the 2-sigma level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
