Is Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics consistent?
Michael Nauenberg

TL;DR
This paper examines the consistency of Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics, revealing that its equivalence with the conventional interpretation does not hold in the momentum representation.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the commonly assumed equivalence between interpretations fails in the momentum representation, challenging prior assumptions.
Findings
Equivalence in coordinate representation is not valid in momentum representation.
Bohm's interpretation has limitations in different quantum representations.
The paper questions the universality of Bohm's interpretation.
Abstract
The supposed equivalence of the conventional interpretation of quantum mechanics with Bohm's interpretation is generally demonstrated only in the coordinate representation. It is shown, however, that in the momentum representation this equivalence is not valid.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
