Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic
Nadia Creignou, Odile Papini, Stefan R\"ummele, Stefan Woltran

TL;DR
This paper introduces a general method for belief merging within fragments of propositional logic, ensuring the merged beliefs stay within the fragment, applicable beyond Horn to any fragment with certain closure properties.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach to derive belief merging operators that preserve the logical fragment, extending previous work limited to Horn fragment.
Findings
Operators satisfy key merging postulates
Applicable to Horn and Krom fragments
Distance-based merging operators analyzed
Abstract
Recently, belief change within the framework of fragments of propositional logic has gained increasing attention. Previous works focused on belief contraction and belief revision on the Horn fragment. However, the problem of belief merging within fragments of propositional logic has been neglected so far. This paper presents a general approach to define new merging operators derived from existing ones such that the result of merging remains in the fragment under consideration. Our approach is not limited to the case of Horn fragment but applicable to any fragment of propositional logic characterized by a closure property on the sets of models of its formulae. We study the logical properties of the proposed operators in terms of satisfaction of merging postulates, considering in particular distance-based merging operators for Horn and Krom fragments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
