The Use of a Single Pseudo-Sample in Approximate Bayesian Computation
Luke Bornn, Natesh Pillai, Aaron Smith, Dawn Woodard

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using a single pseudo-sample in approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), including ABC-MCMC, is as efficient as using multiple samples, simplifying implementation without sacrificing performance.
Contribution
The paper proves that increasing pseudo-samples in ABC-MCMC does not improve efficiency, contrasting with particle MCMC methods, and suggests no need to tune pseudo-sample size.
Findings
Single pseudo-sample suffices for efficient ABC-MCMC
Multiple pseudo-samples do not significantly improve efficiency in ABC
Contrast with particle MCMC where more particles help
Abstract
We analyze the computational efficiency of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), which approximates a likelihood function by drawing pseudo-samples from the associated model. For the rejection sampling version of ABC, it is known that multiple pseudo-samples cannot substantially increase (and can substantially decrease) the efficiency of the algorithm as compared to employing a high-variance estimate based on a single pseudo-sample. We show that this conclusion also holds for a Markov chain Monte Carlo version of ABC, implying that it is unnecessary to tune the number of pseudo-samples used in ABC-MCMC. This conclusion is in contrast to particle MCMC methods, for which increasing the number of particles can provide large gains in computational efficiency.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
