The Nature of Scientific Proof in the Age of Simulations
Kevin Heng
TL;DR
This paper explores whether numerical simulations can serve as a valid form of scientific proof, proposing a new perspective on establishing truth through computational models.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of numerical mimicry as a potential third method of scientific proof beyond empirical and theoretical approaches.
Findings
Numerical simulations can provide compelling evidence in scientific inquiry.
The validity of simulation-based proof depends on specific criteria and context.
Challenges in interpreting simulation results as proof are discussed.
Abstract
Is numerical mimicry a third way of establishing truth?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science