Non-integrability vs. integrability in pentagram maps
Boris Khesin, Fedor Soloviev

TL;DR
This paper investigates the integrability properties of various higher-dimensional pentagram maps, showing that many are non-integrable and proposing a broader framework for understanding their discrete integrability.
Contribution
It introduces a universal class of pentagram maps with projective duality and provides numerical evidence and conjectures on their non-integrability.
Findings
Many higher-dimensional pentagram maps are non-integrable.
A universal class of pentagram maps with projective duality is defined.
Numerical evidence suggests certain generalizations are non-integrable.
Abstract
We revisit recent results on integrable cases for higher-dimensional generalizations of the 2D pentagram map: short-diagonal, dented, deep-dented, and corrugated versions, and define a universal class of pentagram maps, which are proved to possess projective duality. We show that in many cases the pentagram map cannot be included into integrable flows as a time-one map, and discuss how the corresponding notion of discrete integrability can be extended to include jumps between invariant tori. We also present a numerical evidence that certain generalizations of the integrable 2D pentagram map are non-integrable and present a conjecture for a necessary condition of their discrete integrability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
