Mechanism Design for Data Science
Shuchi Chawla, Jason Hartline, Denis Nekipelov

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical framework for designing economic mechanisms that balance optimality with the ability to infer participant preferences from observed actions, enabling adaptive improvements.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to mechanism design that incorporates inferability constraints, allowing mechanisms to adapt based on learned preferences.
Findings
Framework for optimal mechanism design with inferability constraints
Analysis of trade-offs between revenue optimality and learnability
Guidelines for designing mechanisms that facilitate preference inference
Abstract
Good economic mechanisms depend on the preferences of participants in the mechanism. For example, the revenue-optimal auction for selling an item is parameterized by a reserve price, and the appropriate reserve price depends on how much the bidders are willing to pay. A mechanism designer can potentially learn about the participants' preferences by observing historical data from the mechanism; the designer could then update the mechanism in response to learned preferences to improve its performance. The challenge of such an approach is that the data corresponds to the actions of the participants and not their preferences. Preferences can potentially be inferred from actions but the degree of inference possible depends on the mechanism. In the optimal auction example, it is impossible to learn anything about preferences of bidders who are not willing to pay the reserve price. These…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
