What is- and what is not- Electromagnetically-Induced-Transparency in Whispering-Gallery-Microcavities
Bo Peng, Sahin Kaya Ozdemir, Weijian Chen, Franco Nori, Lan Yang

TL;DR
This paper systematically distinguishes between electromagnetically-induced transparency (EIT) and Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) in whispering-gallery microcavities, using the Akaike Information Criterion to clarify their physical origins and transitions.
Contribution
It introduces a method to objectively differentiate EIT and ATS in microcavity systems using the Akaike Information Criterion, clarifying their physical mechanisms and transition.
Findings
A systematic analysis of EIT, Fano, and ATS pathways in coupled microresonators.
First application of Akaike Information Criterion to distinguish EIT and ATS.
Clarification of the transition between EIT and ATS in optical microcavities.
Abstract
Electromagnetically-induced-transparency (EIT) and Autler-Townes splitting (ATS) are two prominent examples of coherent interactions between optical fields and multilevel atoms. They have been observed in various physical systems involving atoms, molecules, meta-structures and plasmons. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the implementations of all-optical analogues of EIT and ATS via the interacting resonant modes of one or more optical microcavities. Despite the differences in their underlying physics, both EIT and ATS are quantified by the appearance of a transparency window in the absorption or transmission spectrum, which often leads to a confusion about its origin. While in EIT the transparency window is a result of Fano interference among different transition pathways, in ATS it is the result of strong field-driven interactions leading to the splitting of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
